Comparative Analysis: Knowledge Transfer 1.0 vs Knowledge Transfer 2.0

The school system of education has witnessed significant advancements over the years, as educators and researchers continuously strive to enhance knowledge transfer and learning outcomes. Two distinct approaches, Knowledge Transfer 1.0 and Knowledge Transfer 2.0, represent contrasting paradigms that reflect the evolution of educational practices.

Students Taking Part in Quiz Contest

Traditional education and system learnography are two contrasting approaches to knowledge transfer. By the way, we delve into the comparison between Knowledge Transfer 1.0 and Knowledge Transfer 2.0, exploring their methodologies, underlying principles and implications for school system.

Knowledge Transfer 1.0: Indirect Learning Model

Knowledge Transfer 1.0 is characterized by traditional education system, where teachers play a central role in transferring knowledge to students through verbal instruction. In this approach, the teacher acts as the primary source of learning, absorbing information from textbooks (written in object language) and delivering it to students in human language. This process represents an indirect form of knowledge transfer, as knowledge is first received by the teacher before being passed on to students.

Cognitive science serves as the basis for Knowledge Transfer 1.0, emphasizing cognitive processes like memory, attention and problem-solving in the learning process. This method has been widely prevalent in education system, with teachers serving as knowledge transformers between textbooks and students.

Knowledge Transfer 2.0: Learnography of Direct Learning (Taxshila Model)

In contrast, Knowledge Transfer 2.0 represents a newer and innovative approach known as the learnography of direct knowledge transfer. It centers on the book as the primary source of knowledge transfer, recognizing that knowledge is created and stored in the object language of school books.

We know that school books are known as textbooks in education system, while these books are called transfer books in system learnography. Students engage in direct learning from the transfer books in object language, bypassing the need for an intermediary knowledge transformer like the teacher.

The basis of Knowledge Transfer 2.0 lies in the neurological studies of motor science, acknowledging that the brain is an intricate network of neural connections shaped by experiences, emotions, knowledge transfer and sensory inputs. This approach leverages the brain's remarkable neuroplasticity, adaptability and multi-sensory processing to enhance the learning experience of knowledge transfer for pre-trained students.

Comparison between Two Approaches: Shiva Narayan

Discover how Knowledge Transfer 1.0 relies on indirect teacher-to-student verbal knowledge transfer, while Knowledge Transfer 2.0 embraces direct learning from transfer books.

1. Source of Knowledge Transfer

Knowledge Transfer 1.0 : Teachers serve as the primary source of knowledge transfer in school system. They receive the definitions, contents and concepts of topics from the textbooks in object language, and deliver it to the students in human language.

Knowledge Transfer 2.0 : The transfer book itself is the primary source of knowledge transfer, allowing pre-training students to engage directly with the topics, contents and tasks of transfer books in object language.

2. Learning Models

Knowledge Transfer 1.0: The period teaching system of education operates on an indirect learning model, where knowledge is transferred from book to teacher to students. This is the cognitive model of school system defined by the most educators. Actually, this is limbic model in practice, as it runs on high motivation and hard instruction.

Knowledge Transfer 2.0: System learnography embraces a direct learning model called Taxshila Model School System. It enables pre-training students to access the definitions, contents and tasks of topics directly from the books of knowledge transfer, by applying the dimensions of book to brain learnography.

3. Learning Principles

Knowledge Transfer 1.0 : As described by Pedagogy, it is rooted in cognitive science, emphasizing cognitive processes in teaching, learning and understanding. Actually, this is the period teaching system of education, which emphasizes on motivation and instruction, embracing the limbic processes of teaching and learning.

Knowledge Transfer 2.0 : Teaching is not necessary in system learnography, as it runs on book to brain direct knowledge transfer. Learnography is based on the facts and findings of motor science, leveraging the brain's neuro-plasticity and multi-sensory processing for enhanced learning. Students use the motor circuits of their brains in the processing of knowledge transfer. They are trained in the dimensions of brainpage theory. They will also know the structural and functional anatomy of human brain to understand the working circuits of motor science. In system learnography, students need pre-training, not the teachers.

4. Role of Teachers

Knowledge Transfer 1.0 : Teaching is everything in education system, and teacher to student verbal knowledge transfer runs in the classroom. In fact, the teachers play a central role as knowledge transformers, facilitators and motivators of school learning.

Knowledge Transfer 2.0: Teachers become task moderators in system learnography. They don't need to perform teaching in school system, as students are doing everything in the process of knowledge transfer. The teachers act as learning facilitators, guiding pre-training students in the direct learning process of book to brain motor knowledge transfer.

Educational Revolution

The comparison between Knowledge Transfer 1.0 and Knowledge Transfer 2.0 underscores the transformative potential of the learnography of direct knowledge transfer.

While Knowledge Transfer 1.0 has been a cornerstone of education for the generations, Knowledge Transfer 2.0 represents an innovative shift towards direct learning from the transfer books.

By leveraging the brain's natural capacity for learning and adaptation, Knowledge Transfer 2.0 opens new horizons in education, empowering students to engage directly with knowledge and fostering deeper understanding and memory retention.

As educators continue to explore and integrate these approaches, the future of education holds exciting prospects for optimized knowledge transfer and enriched learning experiences.

Also Read More...

A classroom of small teachers is defined in school learnography to make high speed brainpage memory modules in book to brain learning transfer.